Measuring self-stability: A methodological note

Tak-Sing Cheung1
1The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Cite this article:  Cheung, T.-S. (1981). Measuring self-stability: A methodological note. Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, 9(2), 219-222.

Volume 9 Issue 2 | e339 | Published: August 1981 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1981.9.2.219

Abstract
Full Text
References
Tables and Figures
Acknowledgements
Author Contact
This paper brings together three major measures of the concept of self-stability, namely, the discrepancy measure, the syndromatic measure, and the longitudinal measure, and assesses their relative strengths as well as weaknesses. It is found that the discrepancy measure is incompatible with the conceptual definition of self-stability. For the remaining two, the syndromatic measure is very likely to be contaminated by social desirability effect, whereas the longitudinal measure fails to take into consideration the fluctuation during the interim between test occasions. It is suggested that the longitudinal measure may be used to check the degree of social desirability effect of the syndromatic measure.
Please login and/or purchase the PDF to view the full article.
Please login and/or purchase the PDF to view the full article.
Please login and/or purchase the PDF to view the full article.
Please login and/or purchase the PDF to view the full article.
Please login and/or purchase the PDF to view the full article.