Impact of college students’ academic procrastination on subjective well-being

Main Article Content

Xiaodong Bu
Lin Wu
Hongchun Wang
Cite this article:  Bu, X., Wu, L., & Wang, H. (2021). Impact of college students’ academic procrastination on subjective well-being. Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, 49(7), e9858.


Abstract
Full Text
References
Tables and Figures
Acknowledgments
Author Contact

We used mindfulness as a mediating variable and self-efficacy as a moderator to examine the relationship between academic procrastination and subjective well-being. Participants comprised 512 college students from Hangzhou, Xiamen, and Huizhou in China. Results show that academic procrastination had a negative impact on subjective well-being, and that mindfulness was a mediator in this relationship. In addition, self-efficacy played a moderating role in the academic procrastination–mindfulness relationship, and, to a certain extent, regulated the relationship between academic procrastination and subjective well-being. Thus, the stronger the self-efficacy of college students, the weaker was the negative predictive effect of academic procrastination on mindfulness. The significance of mindfulness and self-efficacy regarding subjective well-being among procrastinators is discussed.

Positive psychology has received greater interest than has psychopathology in recent research (Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000). A central concept of positive psychology is subjective well-being (SWB), which describes an overall assessment of an individual’s quality of life according to self-determined criteria (Diener, 1984). SWB comprises two dimensions: cognitive (e.g., life satisfaction) and emotional (positive and negative). Many factors affect SWB, including social, familial, and psychological factors; demographic variables; and individual behavior. Among college students, academic procrastination is an essential factor in determining SWB as it contributes to high stress and sleep deprivation, which negatively affect SWB (Kandemir, 2014). In contrast, mindfulness is considered to reduce stress, enhance task persistence, and improve health; thus, it has been found to be positively associated with SWB (Sirois & Tosti, 2012). Self-efficacy, which is said to increase stress coping and improve self-esteem and physical condition, has also been positively linked to SWB (Karademas, 2006). There is a gap in the literature regarding the relationship of these variables; thus, we investigated the mechanisms by which academic procrastination affects SWB, and examined the roles of mindfulness and self-efficacy as a mediator and a moderator, respectively, in this process.

Literature Review and Hypothesis Development

Academic Procrastination and Subjective Well-Being

Academic procrastination (AP), which involves purposefully delaying learning tasks that must be completed (Schraw et al., 2007), is common among college students. It is estimated that 80–95% of college students exhibit procrastination habits (Ellis & Knaus, 1977; O’Brien, 2002). AP leads to behavioral outcomes such as a lower sense of task responsibility, feelings of lack of control in learning activities, reduced possibility of success, and a negative impact on physical and mental health (Çıkrıkçı & Erzen, 2020; Hen & Goroshit, 2020; Tice & Baumeister, 1997). There are also emotional effects, such as pressure, regret, self-blame, shame, panic, and burnout (Ocal, 2016; Sirois, 2016). SWB is an important emotional outcome related to AP, which can lead to the negative emotions of guilt, regret, anxiety, and despair; thus, AP can have a negative effect on SWB (van Eerde, 2003; Zeenath & Orcullo, 2012). Frequent procrastination among college students contributes to a decline in learning efficiency and academic performance, high recurrence of negative emotions, and continuous deterioration of learning engagement. All of these factors affect college students’ physical and mental health, thus weakening their SWB (Berber Çelik & Odaci, 2020; Stead et al., 2010). However, college students who consider the learning task to be enjoyable and able to be completed on time have high SWB high (Little, 1989). Thus, we proposed the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis 1: Academic procrastination will be negatively related to subjective well-being.

Mediating Role of Mindfulness

AP is a typical self-regulation (SR) failure (Steel, 2007). Using social cognitive theory, Bandura (1986) defined self-regulation as the process of self-generation of thoughts, emotion, and behavior to set and achieve individual goals. Procrastinators find it difficult to achieve their goals on time as their self-regulatory system is either misregulated (i.e., taking ineffective action; Sirois & Pychyl, 2013) or underregulated (i.e., failing to take action; Balkis & Duru, 2016). Long-term procrastinators, who are under high cognitive load, objective self-consciousness, and time constraints, may display SR failure in terms of speed and accuracy (Ferrari, 2001). Yang et al. (2019) found in an examination of Chinese college students’ use of smartphones that academic procrastinators had weaker self-regulation; therefore, their smartphone use tended to become problematic. M. Wang et al. (2011) also found in their group counseling intervention research, which was focused on improving SR learning efficacy, that students’ AP decreased as their SR function increased.

Procrastinators’ SR of motivation may fail. Self-determination theory (Deci & Ryan, 1985; Ryan & Deci, 2000) holds that procrastination is closely related to behavioral motivation, namely, the greater the degree of self-determination of motivation, the lower is the procrastination (Li, 2011). Grunschel et al. (2016) found in their study on self-regulated learning that motivation regulation strategies were negatively correlated with procrastination.

The SR of procrastinators’ emotion may also fail. Self-management theory (Gollwitzer et al., 2004) holds that procrastination is the result of poor self-management in individuals’ SR. Such individuals may be ineffective at managing their behavior and emotion, leading to delay, because of improper goal setting or deviation from their plans (Dewitte & Schouwenburg, 2002). Procrastination is a way for them to temporarily escape from anxiety (Solomon & Rothblum, 1984), and may initially improve their mood (Sirois, 2004; Tice et al., 2001). However, their mood may later worsen, leading to a spiral of depression (Lindsley et al., 1995). Thus, procrastination may lead to an emotional SR disorder. As motivational regulation (Grunschel et al., 2016) and emotional regulation (Weytens et al., 2014) are both closely associated with SWB, procrastination may negatively affect SWB through the mediating role of SR of motivation and emotion.

Mindfulness, which is drawn from Buddhism, in which it is one of the eight righteous ways, can be used to relieve suffering and realize self-awakening. Kabat-Zinn’s (1982) introduction of this concept into health psychology brought revolutionary changes to traditional practices (Keng et al., 2011). Mindfulness is a present-centered, nonreactive self-awareness and a nonjudgmental acceptance of thoughts and feelings as they occur (Baer et al., 2004). It can be understood as high-quality consciousness (Rigby et al., 2014). Researchers consider mindfulness to be a state-like trait (W. Duan, 2014), the trait-like function of which enables it to be stably measured. We used the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS; Brown & Ryan, 2003) to assess mindfulness as a trait that can be used in daily life. The scale is also suitable for individuals with no affiliation to Buddhism or background in meditation, such as college students (Brown & Ryan, 2003).

Functions of mindfulness are relevant to SR, for example, the function of SR of motivation. A core characteristic of mindfulness is open or receptive awareness and attention (Martin, 1997). According to self-determination theory, open awareness is particularly valuable for the promotion of behavioral choices that meet individual needs, values, and interests (Deci & Ryan, 1980). The higher is individuals’ trait mindfulness, the more likely they are to act autonomously and voluntarily (Brown & Ryan, 2003). As high autonomy produces strong motivation (Li, 2011), it appears that mindfulness can improve motivation.

In addition, mindfulness has the function of SR of emotion. Kabat-Zinn (2003) showed that if mindfulness is applied to experiences, each stimulus arousal can be detected. When individuals view their experiences in a noncritical and nonevaluative way, they increase the flexibility of their view of people and things, expand their limited experiences and feelings, and can regulate their emotions. Vujanovic et al. (2010) showed that the greater the use of mindfulness, the lower is the difficulty of emotion regulation. Thus, mindfulness helps individuals regulate their emotions. As a key factor in successful SR (Evans et al., 2009), mindfulness has a positive impact on SWB through the SR of both motivation (Brown & Ryan, 2003) and emotion (Weytens et al., 2014).

Therefore, there is a logical chain, as follows: AP leads to imbalance in SR of motivation and emotion, which affects SWB. Mindfulness can supplement the SR of motivation and emotion, and is consequently also related to AP and SWB (Sirois & Tosti, 2012). Thus, we proposed the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis 2: Mindfulness will mediate the relationship between academic procrastination and subjective well-being.

Moderating Role of Self-Efficacy

Self-efficacy (SE) is individuals’ belief that they can reliably perform the required tasks to achieve their goals (Bandura, 1977). The relationship between SE and procrastination was defined by Bandura (1986). In general, procrastinators have low SE, and SE can predict procrastination (Corkin et al., 2014; Haycock, 1993). This may be because SE is an important motivational dimension of self-regulated learning, which is negatively associated with AP (Wolters, 2003). The relationship between AP and SE is negatively mediated by attributional style—in which individuals develop causal reasoning to explain events or behavior (Bao, 2007)—partly by emotions directly linked to academic learning, classroom instruction, and achievement (C. C. Wang, 2010), and completely by self-control in academic matters (Liu et al., 2020). Low SE may lead to a failure spiral (Lindsley et al., 1995), and procrastination may lead to poor performance, which can reduce SE and lead to further procrastination. However, SE can regulate procrastination owing to its SR function.

The main SR function of SE is its regulation of motivation. According to social cognitive theory (Bandura, 1986), SR requires self-control skills, as well as knowledge and individual motivation to employ these skills in relevant situations. SE is especially suitable to explain motivational changes as individuals regulate their own operations. SE can strengthen or weaken individuals’ motivation. Individuals with high (vs. low) SE will choose more challenging tasks and set themselves higher goals. When they act, they will expend greater effort, persist for longer periods, and recover more quickly from setbacks (Bandura, 1997).

The SR function of SE also entails emotional regulation. Individuals with high SE tend to view their emotions in a healthy, positive way and organize their emotional experiences according to an ideal mode (Bandura, 1997). Therefore, SE is a key factor in emotion regulation (DeSteno et al., 2013). Saarni (1999) found that the level of SE has an impact on emotion regulation because as individuals gain confidence in emotional processing, they attain sufficient motivation to fully perceive, analyze, or infer emotional experience. Thus, SE is conducive to emotion regulation. In a practical sense, SE improvement has been found to regulate anxiety, depression, and panic among patients (Bandura, 1997). Choi and Moran (2009) and Chu and Choi (2005), when examining the relationships between procrastination, SE, and SWB, differentiated two types of procrastinators: passive and active. Passive procrastinators are traditional and are paralyzed by their indecision to act and their failure to complete tasks on time, whereas active procrastinators prefer to work under pressure; thus, they intentionally procrastinate. Active (vs. passive) procrastinators have higher (vs. lower) motivation, SE, and SWB, and more positive (vs. negative) emotions. Each type has different motivation, emotions, and SWB, despite exhibiting the same AP behavior. Such a difference may be because SE adjusts procrastinators’ motivation and emotions, which changes their feelings.

There is also a positive relationship between several forms of SE and mindfulness. For example, mindfulness can improve adolescents’ SE in relation to substance use, effectively reducing their consumption of harmful substances (Britton et al., 2010). Because acceptance-based mindfulness approaches encourage individuals to relinquish their psychological and emotional struggle with pain, mindfulness has been shown to improve pain SE (Cusens et al., 2010). Better use of mindfulness skills (e.g., describing, acting with awareness, and accepting without judgment) is associated with higher coping SE, and coping SE serves as a potential mediator in the relationship between mindfulness and emotional regulation difficulties (Luberto et al., 2014). Procrastinators can also improve their SE via mindfulness (Motie et al., 2019). As mindfulness and SE function in ways similar to those of SR and share a negative association with AP, we speculated that SE would regulate the relationship between AP and SWB in college students, and that this regulatory effect would be achieved through the mediator of mindfulness. Thus, high SE would help college students maintain mindfulness in the face of AP, and protect them from experiencing a decline in SWB. Therefore, we proposed the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis 3: Self-efficacy will play a moderating role in the relationship between academic procrastination and mindfulness, such that for college students with high (vs. low) self-efficacy, there will be a weaker negative correlation between academic procrastination and mindfulness.

The integrated framework of this study, in which mindfulness mediates the relationship between AP and SWB and SE moderates the relationship between AP and mindfulness, is shown in Figure 1.

Table/Figure

Figure 1. Study Conceptual Model

Method

Participants and Procedure

From March to June 2019, we posted a notice on campus to students at Hangzhou Normal University (Zhejiang), Xiamen Institute of Technology (Fujian), and Huizhou College (Guangdong) in China to recruit participants, who signed informed consent forms before completing the survey. All participants took part voluntarily and were given a description of the study objective, instructions, and monetary compensation for their participation. Ethical approval was given by the Ethics Committee of Jilin University.

We administered 597 surveys to participants, of which 568 were returned (response rate = 95.14%) and 512 were valid. Of the participants, 353 (68.9%) were women and 159 (31.1%) were men (M = 1.69, SD = 0.46). Regarding level of education, 254 (49.6%) were freshmen, 122 (23.8%) were sophomores, 95 (18.6%) were juniors, and 41 (8%) were seniors (M = 1.85, SD = 0.99). Participants were aged between 18 and 22 years.

Measures

Higher scores on all measures indicate higher levels of the variable, except the reverse-scored AP items, which indicate the opposite.

Academic Procrastination
We measured AP with the Chinese revised version (Chen et al., 2008) of the 19-item Aitken Academic Procrastination Scale (Aitken, 1982). Participants indicate the degree of truthfulness on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (true) to 4 (false), with 10 items forward-scored and nine reverse-scored. A sample positively scored item is “I always wait until the last minute to start doing things,” and a sample reverse-scored item is “I always get my daily tasks done on schedule.” Cronbach’s alpha was .85 in this study.

Subjective Well-Being
We measured SWB using the 48-item Chinese revised version (J. H. Duan, 1996) of the General Well-Being Schedule (Fazio, 1977). The 18 SWB items comprise three dimensions: positive emotions, negative emotions, and health experience, of which participants respond to 14 items using a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely so) to 6 (not at all) and to four items using a 10-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (very depressed) to 10 (very cheerful). A sample item is “Has your life been happy, fulfilling, or enjoyable (during the past month)?” Cronbach’s alpha was .73 in this study.

Mindfulness
We assessed mindfulness using the revised Chinese version (Deng et al., 2012) of the 15-item MAAS (Brown & Ryan, 2003). Participants respond on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (almost always) to 6 (almost never). A sample item is “I find it difficult to stay focused on what’s happening in the present.” Cronbach’s alpha was .86 in this study.

Self-Efficacy
SE was measured with 10 items from the Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale (Schwarzer & Jerusalem, 1995), revised to fit the Chinese cultural context (C. K. Wang et al., 2001). Participants rate the one-dimensional items on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all true) to 4 (exactly true). A sample item is “I try my best and I am sure to solve all the problems.” Cronbach’s alpha was .84 in this study.

Control Variables
We controlled for the gender and grade of the participants because these variables could affect our results.

Data Analysis

We analyzed the data using SPSS 20.0.

Results

Hypothesis Testing

Means, standard deviations, and correlations among study variables are shown in Table 1. All scales had good internal reliability (Cronbach’s α = .73–.86). There was a negative correlation between AP and SWB, a positive correlation between mindfulness and SWB, a negative correlation between AP and mindfulness, and a positive correlation between SE and SWB. The magnitude and direction of these correlations were consistent with our predictions and provided initial support for the hypotheses.

Table 1. Means, Standard Deviations, and Correlations for Study Variables

Table/Figure

Note. N = 512.
* p < .05. ** p < .01.

The regression results from the hypothesis testing are shown in Table 2. In Model 3, AP was negatively related to SWB. Thus, Hypothesis 1 was supported.

Hypothesis 2 was examined in Models 1, 2, and 4. In Model 1, AP was negatively related to mindfulness, and mindfulness was positively related to SWB in Model 2. In Model 4, the relationship between AP and SWB remained significant when mindfulness was added as a mediator, showing that mindfulness partly mediated the relationship between AP and SWB. Thus, Hypothesis 2 was supported.

Table 2. Regression Results for Mediation and Moderation Testing

Table/Figure

Note. N = 512.
* p < .05. ** p < .01. *** p < .001.

Hypothesis 3 was tested in Models 2 and 5. In Model 2, SWB was significantly influenced by mindfulness. When SE and the interaction of AP × SE were incorporated, the interaction was significantly positive, meaning that SE was a moderator. Thus, Hypothesis 3 was supported.

To further analyze the moderating effect of SE, we divided participants into a low SE group (M – 1 SD) and a high SE group (M + 1 SD), then performed a simple slope test (see Figure 2). AP was negatively related to mindfulness in both the high SE group (β = −.31, SE = 0.06, p < .001) and the low SE group (β = −.47, SE = 0.05, p < .001); however, for participants with high (vs. low) SE, the negative correlation between AP and mindfulness was lower.

Table/Figure

Figure 2. Moderating Effect of Self-Efficacy in the Relationship Between Academic Procrastination and Mindfulness

Discussion

To investigate the mechanisms of AP on SWB, we used mindfulness as the mediating variable and SE as the moderating variable. Consistent with our hypotheses, our results show that AP had a significant negative impact on SWB, and mindfulness had a significant positive effect on SWB. In addition, SE moderated the relationship between AP and mindfulness. The stronger the SE of our college student participants, the weaker was the predictive effect of AP on mindfulness.

Theoretical Implications

We used a theoretical model to examine the relationships of AP, mindfulness, SE, and SWB. Our results show that AP reduced SWB, which is likely to occur because AP causes negative consequences such as academic failure, stress, anxiety, and low life satisfaction. This finding is consistent with previous study results (Kandemir, 2014; Savithri, 2014). Further, we found that mindfulness partially mediated the relationship between AP and SWB. Because procrastinators are more likely to exhibit low mindfulness, their SR of motivation and emotion may fail. Thus, they will have low SWB, which is consistent with previous study findings (Sirois & Tosti, 2012). We also found that this mediating effect was regulated by SE. As individuals with high (vs. low) SE have a less damaged SR function, they are more confident in facing the challenges of procrastination, more likely to be in a mindful state, and better at controlling their time and emotions. Hence, the negative consequences of AP, such as reduced mindfulness and an attendant decrease in SWB, were reduced, which is consistent with Chu and Choi’s (2005) results.

Practical Implications

Our results have three main practical implications: First, because AP has an important influence on SWB, reduction of the AP behavior of college students should be sought. For example, teachers can detect procrastination and intervene in the learning process of procrastinators in a timely manner using methods such as goal setting, process control, and results feedback, thus guiding their change in SWB (Balkis & Duru, 2016; Kaftan & Freund, 2018). Second, because mindfulness is also important in the improvement of procrastinators’ SWB, students’ mindfulness should be cultivated through practices such as yoga and meditation, and through mindfulness-based stress reduction programs (Kabat-Zinn et al., 1992; Sirois & Tosti, 2012). Third, as SE is important for procrastinators’ mindfulness and SWB improvement, students’ SE should be cultivated by an increase in their sense of time control and an improvement in their learning ability (Bandura, 1982; Macan, 1994).

Limitations and Directions for Future Research

There are some limitations in this study. As the participants were students from a small group of universities in three regions of China, our conclusions require testing with a wider range of participants. Although the regression model was suitable for testing implied causal relationships between variables, the direction of causality cannot be determined from our results. According to Altman (1991), findings obtained via cross-sectional research designs are not generalizable. As longitudinal research designs provide more stable directional exploration, they could be adopted by future researchers to confirm our results. Further, although we controlled for participants’ gender and grade, future researchers could add more control variables. In addition, future researchers could divide AP into categories, such as active and passive (Chu & Choi, 2005), or arousal and avoidance (Ferrari et al., 2005), and explore the mechanisms of mindfulness and SE on the SWB of the different procrastination categories to show more precisely the scope of their effects.

References

Aitken, M. E. (1982). A personality profile of the college student procrastinator (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Altman, D. G. (1991). Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199110103251524

Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., & Allen, K. B. (2004). Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: The Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills. Assessment, 11(3), 191–206.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191104268029

Balkis, M., & Duru, E. (2016). Procrastination, self-regulation failure, academic life satisfaction, and affective well-being: Underregulation or misregulation form. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31(3), 439–459.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-015-0266-5

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191

Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.37.2.122

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.

Bao, C. Q. (2007). The relationship among procrastination, self-efficacy and self-esteem in university students [In Chinese] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Southwest University, Chongqing, China.

Berber Çelik, Ç., & Odaci, H. (2020). Subjective well-being in university students: What are the impacts of procrastination and attachment styles? British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 4, 1–14.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2020.1803211

Britton, W. B., Bootzin, R. R., Cousins, J. C., Hasler, B. P., Peck, T., & Shapiro, S. L. (2010). The contribution of mindfulness practice to a multicomponent behavioral sleep intervention following substance abuse treatment in adolescents: A treatment-development study. Substance Abuse, 31(2), 86–97.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08897071003641297

Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822

Chen, X. L., Dai, X. Y., & Dong, Q. (2008). A revised version of the Aitken Procrastination Inventory for use with Chinese college students [In Chinese]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 16(1), 22–23.

Choi, J. N., & Moran, S. V. (2009). Why not procrastinate? Development and validation of a new active procrastination scale. The Journal of Social Psychology, 149(2), 195–212.
https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.149.2.195-212

Chu, A. H. C., & Choi, J. N. (2005). Rethinking procrastination: Positive effects of “active” procrastination behavior on attitudes and performance. The Journal of Social Psychology, 145(3), 245–264.
https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.145.3.245-264

Çıkrıkçı, Ö., & Erzen, E. (2020). Academic procrastination, school attachment, and life satisfaction: A mediation model. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 38(2), 225–242.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-020-00336-5

Corkin, D. M., Yu, S. L., Wolters, C. A., & Wiesner, M. (2014). The role of the college classroom climate on academic procrastination. Learning and Individual Differences, 32, 294–303.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.04.001

Cusens, B., Duggan, G. B., Thorne, K., & Burch, V. (2010). Evaluation of the breathworks mindfulness-based pain management programme: Effects on well-being and multiple measures of mindfulness. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 17(1), 63–78.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.653

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1980). Self-determination theory: When mind mediates behavior. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 1(1), 33–43.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7

Deng, Y.-Q., Li, S., Tang, Y.-Y., Zhu, L.-H., Ryan, R., & Brown, K. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Chinese translation of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS). Mindfulness, 3(1), 10–14.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-011-0074-1

DeSteno, D., Gross, J. J., & Kubzansky, L. (2013). Affective science and health: The importance of emotion and emotion regulation. Health Psychology, 32(5), 474–486.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030259

Dewitte, S., & Schouwenburg, H. C. (2002). Procrastination, temptations, and incentives: The struggle between the present and the future in procrastinators and the punctual. European Journal of Personality, 16(6), 469–489.
https://doi.org/10.1002/per.461

Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542

Duan, J. H. (1996). Trial results and analysis of the General Well-Being Scale with a sample of Chinese college students [In Chinese]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 4(1), 56–57.

Duan, W. (2014). Disagreement in studies on mindfulness: Conceptualization and measurements [In Chinese]. Advances in Psychological Science, 22(10), 1616–1627.
https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.01616

Ellis, A., & Knaus, W. J. (1977). Overcoming procrastination. Institute for Rational Living.

Evans, D. R., Baer, R. A., & Segerstrom, S. C. (2009). The effects of mindfulness and self-consciousness on persistence. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(4), 379–382.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.03.026

Fazio, A. F. (1977). A concurrent validational study of the NCHS General Well-Being Schedule. Vital and health statistics: Series 2, data evaluation and methods research, No. 73. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.

Ferrari, J. R. (2001). Procrastination as self-regulation failure of performance: Effects of cognitive load, self-awareness, and time limits on ‘working best under pressure.’ European Journal of Personality, 15(5), 391–406
https://doi.org/10.1002/per.413

Ferrari, J. R., Doroszko, E., & Joseph, N. (2005). Exploring procrastination in corporate settings: Sex, status, and settings for arousal and avoidance types. Individual Differences Research, 3(2), 140–149.

Gollwitzer, P. M., Fujita, K., & Oettingen, G. (2004). Planning and the implementation of goals. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 211–228). Guilford Press.

Grunschel, C., Schwinger, M., Steinmayr, R., & Fries, S. (2016). Effects of using motivational regulation strategies on students’ academic procrastination, academic performance, and well-being. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 162–170.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.06.008

Haycock, L. A. (1993). The cognitive mediation of procrastination: An investigation of the relationship between procrastination and self-efficacy beliefs (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota, MN, USA.

Hen, M., & Goroshit, M. (2020). The effects of decisional and academic procrastination on students’ feelings toward academic procrastination. Current Psychology, 39(2), 556–563.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9777-3

Kabat-Zinn, J. (1982). An outpatient program in behavioral medicine for chronic pain patients based on the practice of mindfulness meditation: Theoretical considerations and preliminary results. General Hospital Psychiatry, 4(1), 33–47.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0163-8343(82)90026-3

Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 144–156.
https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bpg016

Kabat-Zinn, J., Massion, A. O., Kristeller, J., Peterson, L. G., Fletcher, K. E., Pbert, L., … Santorelli, S. F. (1992). Effectiveness of a meditation-based stress reduction program in the treatment of anxiety disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 149(7), 936–943.
https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.149.7.936

Kaftan, O. J., & Freund, A. M. (2018). The way is the goal: The role of goal focus for successful goal pursuit and subjective well-being. In E. Diener, S. Oishi, & L. Tay (Eds.), Handbook of well-being. DEF Publishers.

Kandemir, M. (2014). Reasons of academic procrastination: Self-regulation, academic self-efficacy, life satisfaction and demographics variables. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 188–193.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.179

Karademas, E. C. (2006). Self-efficacy, social support and well-being: The mediating role of optimism. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(6), 1281–1290.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.10.019

Keng, S.-L., Smoski, M. J., & Robins, C. J. (2011). Effects of mindfulness on psychological health: A review of empirical studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(6), 1041–1056.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.04.006

Li, J. (2011). The effect of self-efficacy and task efficacy on the relationship between academic procrastination and self-limitation [In Chinese] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, China.
https://doi.org/10.7666/d.y1944289

Lindsley, D. H., Brass, D. J., & Thomas, J. B. (1995). Efficacy-performance spirals: A multilevel perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 645–678.
https://doi.org/10.2307/258790

Little, B. R. (1989). Personal projects analysis: Trivial pursuits, magnificent obsessions, and the search for coherence. In D. M. Buss & N. Cantor (Eds.), Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions (pp. 15–31), Springer-Verlag.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-0634-4_2

Liu, G., Cheng, G., Hu, J., Pan, Y., & Zhao, S. (2020). Academic self-efficacy and postgraduate procrastination: A moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article e1752.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01752

Luberto, C. M., Cotton, S., McLeish, A. C., Mingione, C. J., & O’Bryan, E. M. (2014). Mindfulness skills and emotion regulation: The mediating role of coping self-efficacy. Mindfulness, 5(4), 373–380.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-012-0190-6

Macan, T. H. (1994). Time management: Test of a process model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(3), 381–391.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.3.381

Martin, J. R. (1997). Mindfulness: A proposed common factor. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 7(4), 291–312.

Motie, H., Heidari, M., Bagherian, F., & Zarani, F. (2019). Providing mindfulness-based educational package for evaluating academic procrastination. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, 25(1), 26–41.
https://doi.org/10.32598/ijpcp.25.1.25

O’Brien, W. K. (2002). Applying the transtheoretical model to academic procrastination (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Houston, TX, USA.

Ocal, K. (2016). Predictors of academic procrastination and university life satisfaction among Turkish sport schools students. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(7), 482–490.
https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2016.2645

Rigby, C. S., Schultz, P. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2014). Mindfulness, interest-taking, and self-regulation: A self-determination theory perspective on the role of awareness in optimal functioning. In A. Ie, C. T. Ngnoumen, & E. J. Langer (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of mindfulness (pp. 216–235). Wiley Blackwell.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118294895.ch12

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.68

Saarni, C. (1999). The development of emotional competence. Guilford Press.

Savithri, J. J. (2014). Interactive effect of academic procrastination and academic performance on life satisfaction. International Journal of Science and Research, 3(3), 377–381.

Schraw, G., Wadkins, T., & Olafson, L. (2007). Doing the things we do: A grounded theory of academic procrastination. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 12–25.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.12

Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale. In J. Wienman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35–37). NFER-Nelson.

Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5

Sirois, F. M. (2004). Procrastination and counterfactual thinking: Avoiding what might have been. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43(2), 269–286.
https://doi.org/10.1348/0144666041501660

Sirois, F. M. (2016). Procrastination, stress, and chronic health conditions: A temporal perspective. In F. M. Sirois & T. A. Pychyl (Eds.), Procrastination, health, and well-being (pp. 67–92). Academic Press.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802862-9.00004-9

Sirois, F. M., & Pychyl, T. A. (2013). Procrastination and the priority of short-term mood regulation: Consequences for future self. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(2), 115–127.
https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12011

Sirois, F. M., & Tosti, N. (2012). Lost in the moment? An investigation of procrastination, mindfulness, and well-being. Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 30(4), 237–248.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-012-0151-y

Solomon, L. J., & Rothblum, E. D. (1984). Academic-procrastination: Frequency and cognitive-behavioral correlates. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31(4), 503–509.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.31.4.503

Stead, R., Shanahan, M. J., Neufeld, R. W. J. (2010). “I’ll go to therapy, eventually”: Procrastination, stress and mental health. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(3), 175–180.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.028

Steel, P. (2007). The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 65–94.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.65

Tice, D. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (1997). Longitudinal study of procrastination, performance, stress, and health: The costs and benefits of dawdling. Psychological Science, 8(6), 454–458.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00460.x

Tice, D. M., Bratslavsky, E., & Baumeister, R. F. (2001). Emotional distress regulation takes precedence over impulse control: If you feel bad, do it! Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 53–67.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.53

van Eerde, W. (2003). A meta-analytically derived nomological network of procrastination. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(6), 1401–1418.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00358-6

Vujanovic, A. A., Bonn-Miller, M. O., Bernstein, A., McKee, L. G., & Zvolensky, M. J. (2010). Incremental validity of mindfulness skills in relation to emotional dysregulation among a young adult community sample. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 39(3), 203–213.
https://doi.org/10.1080/16506070903441630

Wang, C. C. (2010). A study on the relationships between self-efficacy, academic emotions, and academic procrastination among junior high school students [In Chinese] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Hebei Normal University, Hebei, China.
https://doi.org/10.7666/d.d124934

Wang, C. K., Hu, Z. F., & Liu, Y. (2001). Study on the reliability and validity of the General Self-Efficacy Scale [In Chinese]. Applied Psychology, 7(1), 37–40.
https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-6020.2001.01.007

Wang, M., Qian, M.-Y., Wang, W.-Y., & Chen, R.-Y. (2011). Effects of group counseling based on self-efficacy for self-regulated learning in students with academic procrastination [In Chinese]. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 25(12), 921–926.

Weytens, F., Luminet, O., Verhofstadt, L. L., & Mikolajczak, M. (2014). An integrative theory-driven positive emotion regulation intervention. PloS ONE, 9(4), Article e95677.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095677

Wolters, C. A. (2003). Understanding procrastination from a self-regulated learning perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 179–187.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.179

Yang, Z., Asbury, K., & Griffiths, M. D. (2019). An exploration of problematic smartphone use among Chinese university students: Associations with academic anxiety, academic procrastination, self-regulation and subjective well-being. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 17(3), 596–614.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-9961-1

Zeenath, S., & Orcullo, D. J. C. (2012). Exploring academic procrastination among undergraduates. International Proceedings of Economics Development & Research, 47(9), 42–46.

Aitken, M. E. (1982). A personality profile of the college student procrastinator (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Altman, D. G. (1991). Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199110103251524

Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., & Allen, K. B. (2004). Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: The Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills. Assessment, 11(3), 191–206.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191104268029

Balkis, M., & Duru, E. (2016). Procrastination, self-regulation failure, academic life satisfaction, and affective well-being: Underregulation or misregulation form. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31(3), 439–459.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-015-0266-5

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191

Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.37.2.122

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.

Bao, C. Q. (2007). The relationship among procrastination, self-efficacy and self-esteem in university students [In Chinese] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Southwest University, Chongqing, China.

Berber Çelik, Ç., & Odaci, H. (2020). Subjective well-being in university students: What are the impacts of procrastination and attachment styles? British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 4, 1–14.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2020.1803211

Britton, W. B., Bootzin, R. R., Cousins, J. C., Hasler, B. P., Peck, T., & Shapiro, S. L. (2010). The contribution of mindfulness practice to a multicomponent behavioral sleep intervention following substance abuse treatment in adolescents: A treatment-development study. Substance Abuse, 31(2), 86–97.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08897071003641297

Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822

Chen, X. L., Dai, X. Y., & Dong, Q. (2008). A revised version of the Aitken Procrastination Inventory for use with Chinese college students [In Chinese]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 16(1), 22–23.

Choi, J. N., & Moran, S. V. (2009). Why not procrastinate? Development and validation of a new active procrastination scale. The Journal of Social Psychology, 149(2), 195–212.
https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.149.2.195-212

Chu, A. H. C., & Choi, J. N. (2005). Rethinking procrastination: Positive effects of “active” procrastination behavior on attitudes and performance. The Journal of Social Psychology, 145(3), 245–264.
https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.145.3.245-264

Çıkrıkçı, Ö., & Erzen, E. (2020). Academic procrastination, school attachment, and life satisfaction: A mediation model. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 38(2), 225–242.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-020-00336-5

Corkin, D. M., Yu, S. L., Wolters, C. A., & Wiesner, M. (2014). The role of the college classroom climate on academic procrastination. Learning and Individual Differences, 32, 294–303.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.04.001

Cusens, B., Duggan, G. B., Thorne, K., & Burch, V. (2010). Evaluation of the breathworks mindfulness-based pain management programme: Effects on well-being and multiple measures of mindfulness. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 17(1), 63–78.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.653

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1980). Self-determination theory: When mind mediates behavior. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 1(1), 33–43.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7

Deng, Y.-Q., Li, S., Tang, Y.-Y., Zhu, L.-H., Ryan, R., & Brown, K. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Chinese translation of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS). Mindfulness, 3(1), 10–14.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-011-0074-1

DeSteno, D., Gross, J. J., & Kubzansky, L. (2013). Affective science and health: The importance of emotion and emotion regulation. Health Psychology, 32(5), 474–486.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030259

Dewitte, S., & Schouwenburg, H. C. (2002). Procrastination, temptations, and incentives: The struggle between the present and the future in procrastinators and the punctual. European Journal of Personality, 16(6), 469–489.
https://doi.org/10.1002/per.461

Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542

Duan, J. H. (1996). Trial results and analysis of the General Well-Being Scale with a sample of Chinese college students [In Chinese]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 4(1), 56–57.

Duan, W. (2014). Disagreement in studies on mindfulness: Conceptualization and measurements [In Chinese]. Advances in Psychological Science, 22(10), 1616–1627.
https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.01616

Ellis, A., & Knaus, W. J. (1977). Overcoming procrastination. Institute for Rational Living.

Evans, D. R., Baer, R. A., & Segerstrom, S. C. (2009). The effects of mindfulness and self-consciousness on persistence. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(4), 379–382.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.03.026

Fazio, A. F. (1977). A concurrent validational study of the NCHS General Well-Being Schedule. Vital and health statistics: Series 2, data evaluation and methods research, No. 73. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.

Ferrari, J. R. (2001). Procrastination as self-regulation failure of performance: Effects of cognitive load, self-awareness, and time limits on ‘working best under pressure.’ European Journal of Personality, 15(5), 391–406
https://doi.org/10.1002/per.413

Ferrari, J. R., Doroszko, E., & Joseph, N. (2005). Exploring procrastination in corporate settings: Sex, status, and settings for arousal and avoidance types. Individual Differences Research, 3(2), 140–149.

Gollwitzer, P. M., Fujita, K., & Oettingen, G. (2004). Planning and the implementation of goals. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 211–228). Guilford Press.

Grunschel, C., Schwinger, M., Steinmayr, R., & Fries, S. (2016). Effects of using motivational regulation strategies on students’ academic procrastination, academic performance, and well-being. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 162–170.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.06.008

Haycock, L. A. (1993). The cognitive mediation of procrastination: An investigation of the relationship between procrastination and self-efficacy beliefs (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota, MN, USA.

Hen, M., & Goroshit, M. (2020). The effects of decisional and academic procrastination on students’ feelings toward academic procrastination. Current Psychology, 39(2), 556–563.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9777-3

Kabat-Zinn, J. (1982). An outpatient program in behavioral medicine for chronic pain patients based on the practice of mindfulness meditation: Theoretical considerations and preliminary results. General Hospital Psychiatry, 4(1), 33–47.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0163-8343(82)90026-3

Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 144–156.
https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bpg016

Kabat-Zinn, J., Massion, A. O., Kristeller, J., Peterson, L. G., Fletcher, K. E., Pbert, L., … Santorelli, S. F. (1992). Effectiveness of a meditation-based stress reduction program in the treatment of anxiety disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 149(7), 936–943.
https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.149.7.936

Kaftan, O. J., & Freund, A. M. (2018). The way is the goal: The role of goal focus for successful goal pursuit and subjective well-being. In E. Diener, S. Oishi, & L. Tay (Eds.), Handbook of well-being. DEF Publishers.

Kandemir, M. (2014). Reasons of academic procrastination: Self-regulation, academic self-efficacy, life satisfaction and demographics variables. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 188–193.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.179

Karademas, E. C. (2006). Self-efficacy, social support and well-being: The mediating role of optimism. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(6), 1281–1290.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.10.019

Keng, S.-L., Smoski, M. J., & Robins, C. J. (2011). Effects of mindfulness on psychological health: A review of empirical studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(6), 1041–1056.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.04.006

Li, J. (2011). The effect of self-efficacy and task efficacy on the relationship between academic procrastination and self-limitation [In Chinese] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, China.
https://doi.org/10.7666/d.y1944289

Lindsley, D. H., Brass, D. J., & Thomas, J. B. (1995). Efficacy-performance spirals: A multilevel perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 645–678.
https://doi.org/10.2307/258790

Little, B. R. (1989). Personal projects analysis: Trivial pursuits, magnificent obsessions, and the search for coherence. In D. M. Buss & N. Cantor (Eds.), Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions (pp. 15–31), Springer-Verlag.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-0634-4_2

Liu, G., Cheng, G., Hu, J., Pan, Y., & Zhao, S. (2020). Academic self-efficacy and postgraduate procrastination: A moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article e1752.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01752

Luberto, C. M., Cotton, S., McLeish, A. C., Mingione, C. J., & O’Bryan, E. M. (2014). Mindfulness skills and emotion regulation: The mediating role of coping self-efficacy. Mindfulness, 5(4), 373–380.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-012-0190-6

Macan, T. H. (1994). Time management: Test of a process model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(3), 381–391.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.3.381

Martin, J. R. (1997). Mindfulness: A proposed common factor. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 7(4), 291–312.

Motie, H., Heidari, M., Bagherian, F., & Zarani, F. (2019). Providing mindfulness-based educational package for evaluating academic procrastination. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, 25(1), 26–41.
https://doi.org/10.32598/ijpcp.25.1.25

O’Brien, W. K. (2002). Applying the transtheoretical model to academic procrastination (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Houston, TX, USA.

Ocal, K. (2016). Predictors of academic procrastination and university life satisfaction among Turkish sport schools students. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(7), 482–490.
https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2016.2645

Rigby, C. S., Schultz, P. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2014). Mindfulness, interest-taking, and self-regulation: A self-determination theory perspective on the role of awareness in optimal functioning. In A. Ie, C. T. Ngnoumen, & E. J. Langer (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of mindfulness (pp. 216–235). Wiley Blackwell.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118294895.ch12

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.68

Saarni, C. (1999). The development of emotional competence. Guilford Press.

Savithri, J. J. (2014). Interactive effect of academic procrastination and academic performance on life satisfaction. International Journal of Science and Research, 3(3), 377–381.

Schraw, G., Wadkins, T., & Olafson, L. (2007). Doing the things we do: A grounded theory of academic procrastination. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 12–25.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.12

Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale. In J. Wienman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35–37). NFER-Nelson.

Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5

Sirois, F. M. (2004). Procrastination and counterfactual thinking: Avoiding what might have been. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43(2), 269–286.
https://doi.org/10.1348/0144666041501660

Sirois, F. M. (2016). Procrastination, stress, and chronic health conditions: A temporal perspective. In F. M. Sirois & T. A. Pychyl (Eds.), Procrastination, health, and well-being (pp. 67–92). Academic Press.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802862-9.00004-9

Sirois, F. M., & Pychyl, T. A. (2013). Procrastination and the priority of short-term mood regulation: Consequences for future self. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(2), 115–127.
https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12011

Sirois, F. M., & Tosti, N. (2012). Lost in the moment? An investigation of procrastination, mindfulness, and well-being. Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 30(4), 237–248.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-012-0151-y

Solomon, L. J., & Rothblum, E. D. (1984). Academic-procrastination: Frequency and cognitive-behavioral correlates. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31(4), 503–509.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.31.4.503

Stead, R., Shanahan, M. J., Neufeld, R. W. J. (2010). “I’ll go to therapy, eventually”: Procrastination, stress and mental health. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(3), 175–180.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.028

Steel, P. (2007). The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 65–94.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.65

Tice, D. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (1997). Longitudinal study of procrastination, performance, stress, and health: The costs and benefits of dawdling. Psychological Science, 8(6), 454–458.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00460.x

Tice, D. M., Bratslavsky, E., & Baumeister, R. F. (2001). Emotional distress regulation takes precedence over impulse control: If you feel bad, do it! Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 53–67.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.53

van Eerde, W. (2003). A meta-analytically derived nomological network of procrastination. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(6), 1401–1418.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00358-6

Vujanovic, A. A., Bonn-Miller, M. O., Bernstein, A., McKee, L. G., & Zvolensky, M. J. (2010). Incremental validity of mindfulness skills in relation to emotional dysregulation among a young adult community sample. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 39(3), 203–213.
https://doi.org/10.1080/16506070903441630

Wang, C. C. (2010). A study on the relationships between self-efficacy, academic emotions, and academic procrastination among junior high school students [In Chinese] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Hebei Normal University, Hebei, China.
https://doi.org/10.7666/d.d124934

Wang, C. K., Hu, Z. F., & Liu, Y. (2001). Study on the reliability and validity of the General Self-Efficacy Scale [In Chinese]. Applied Psychology, 7(1), 37–40.
https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-6020.2001.01.007

Wang, M., Qian, M.-Y., Wang, W.-Y., & Chen, R.-Y. (2011). Effects of group counseling based on self-efficacy for self-regulated learning in students with academic procrastination [In Chinese]. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 25(12), 921–926.

Weytens, F., Luminet, O., Verhofstadt, L. L., & Mikolajczak, M. (2014). An integrative theory-driven positive emotion regulation intervention. PloS ONE, 9(4), Article e95677.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095677

Wolters, C. A. (2003). Understanding procrastination from a self-regulated learning perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 179–187.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.179

Yang, Z., Asbury, K., & Griffiths, M. D. (2019). An exploration of problematic smartphone use among Chinese university students: Associations with academic anxiety, academic procrastination, self-regulation and subjective well-being. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 17(3), 596–614.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-9961-1

Zeenath, S., & Orcullo, D. J. C. (2012). Exploring academic procrastination among undergraduates. International Proceedings of Economics Development & Research, 47(9), 42–46.

Table/Figure

Figure 1. Study Conceptual Model


Table 1. Means, Standard Deviations, and Correlations for Study Variables

Table/Figure

Note. N = 512.
* p < .05. ** p < .01.


Table 2. Regression Results for Mediation and Moderation Testing

Table/Figure

Note. N = 512.
* p < .05. ** p < .01. *** p < .001.


Table/Figure

Figure 2. Moderating Effect of Self-Efficacy in the Relationship Between Academic Procrastination and Mindfulness


Lin Wu, School of Sociology, Wuhan University, No. 299 Bayi Road, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, People’s Republic of China. Email: [email protected]

Article Details

© 2021 Scientific Journal Publishers Limited. All Rights Reserved.