Compulsory citizenship behavior and employees’ contextual performance: Roles of perceived psychological safety and political skill

Main Article Content

Tsang-Kai Hung

Shu-Chuan Lee

Yung-Shun Wu

Hui-Min Hsieh

Cite this article:  Hung, T.-K., Lee, S.-C., Wu, Y.-S., & Hsieh, H.-M. (2022). Compulsory citizenship behavior and employees’ contextual performance: Roles of perceived psychological safety and political skill. Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, 50(11), e11918.


Abstract
Full Text
References
Tables and Figures
Acknowledgments
Author Contact

We explored whether compulsory citizenship behavior (CCB) influenced employees’ contextual performance via their perception of psychological safety, and examined whether political skill moderated this path. Participants were dyads formed by 139 supervisors and 534 subordinates from businesses in Taiwan. The results reveal that CCB was negatively associated with contextual performance through the mediator of perceived psychological safety. However, there was no significant moderating effect of political skill. This study fills a gap in the literature on CCB. Our results indicate that managers of organizations should pay attention to CCB and to their employees’ mental health when trying to encourage enhanced work performance.

Article Highlights

  • We used social exchange theory to explore the evolution from organizational citizenship behavior to compulsory citizenship behavior.
  • Compulsory citizenship behavior was found to be negatively associated with employees’ contextual performance through the mediator of their perception of psychological safety.
  • Employees’ political skill did not have a significant moderating effect on the relationship between perceived psychological safety and contextual performance.
  • Employees’ political skill did not have a significant moderating effect on the relationship between compulsory citizenship behavior and contextual performance via perceived psychological safety.

According to social exchange theory (Homans, 1958; later revised by Z. Liu et al., 2016), subordinates’ behavior in the workplace is governed by the contrast between subjective cost–benefit analysis and other choices for weighted relative interests. More specifically, subordinates will meet their employer’s expectations and maintain positive relationships if they feel valued (Rhoades & Eisenberger, 2002). Conversely, subordinates will feel frustrated if their employer ill-treats them or does not fulfill the terms of their contract.

However, to achieve organizational goals, subordinates must willingly engage in extrarole behaviors, which can have negative effects. For instance, being required to perform extrarole behaviors results in a heavier workload for subordinates that goes beyond their designated work responsibilities. As a result, they feel greater work pressure and, in severe cases, experience emotional exhaustion or engage in negative behaviors (Vigoda-Gadot, 2007). Although extrarole behaviors inevitably increase subordinates’ workload, supervisors might indirectly make their subordinates aware that refusing to take on more responsibility could put their work or social position at risk (Vigoda-Gadot, 2007). This creates an atmosphere where taking on additional work becomes the norm in the workplace.

The notion of organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) comes from Barnard (1938) and refers to a cooperative system in which the contributions of individuals in the workplace are integrated. OCB promotes effectiveness and efficiency within an organization, since it is characterized by purposeful cooperation among subordinates. Therefore, it represents the willingness of subordinates to invest effort in their job (H. Zhang et al., 2020). Organ (1988) referred to extrarole workplace behavior as the good soldier syndrome, meaning activity that goes beyond formal requirements and has no expectation of reward. Employees with good soldier syndrome have been found to have positive personality characteristics and a disciplined and dedicated attitude. Therefore, OCB has been redefined as a spontaneous initiative taken by subordinates, and it is recognized as an extrarole behavior that is performed with no expectation of additional advantages (Köksal & Gürsoy, 2020).

As an extension to OCB theory, Schein et al. (1961) proposed that social influence can be modified via forced strategy, persuasion, and manipulation, all of which steer individuals toward engaging in interpersonal and group behaviors. This is termed compulsory citizenship behavior (CCB). However, to increase productivity, some supervisors—especially those working in highly competitive industries—create an unfair work environment that pressures subordinates into performing CCB.

Subordinates also evaluate their working environment based on their perception of psychological safety, which can be reflected in their work performance (Lyu, 2016; Tiwari & Lenka, 2016) and, subsequently, organizational performance (Ayenew et al., 2015; Baer & Frese, 2003). In the context of the workplace, psychological safety is an indicator of subordinates’ psychological contract with and trust in an organization (Smithson & Lewis, 2000). Therefore, psychological safety can be defined as a subordinate having the confidence to make a statement without fear of repercussions (Detert & Burris, 2007; Ge, 2020; J. Liang et al., 2012).

Rich et al. (2010) stated that performance is a collection of individual actions that can be divided into task and contextual types. Task performance refers to job responsibilities that directly contribute to the operation of core technical processes (Hawkes & Weathington, 2014). The goal of task performance is to complete the task at hand, which is undoubtedly the main contributor to overall organizational performance. Contextual performance refers to the individual’s enthusiasm for completing tasks, being willing to help others, and following the organizational rules, including volunteering and mutual help (Borman & Motowidlo, 1997). Therefore, contextual performance entails extrarole behavior that is not listed in a job description and that is harder to measure but vital. Although OCB, CCB, and contextual performance are all out-of-role behaviors, CCB usually occurs when subordinates feel forced to perform the behaviors. Conversely, contextual performance refers to the voluntary behavior of subordinates and is an aspect of OCB (Zellars et al., 2002). Hence, as CCB is a citizenship behavior that is an extension of OCB (Schein et al., 1961; Zhao et al., 2013), we examined the extent to which contextual performance is negatively affected by CCB through the mediator of perceived psychological safety.

Political skill is the ability to work with and influence others to achieve organizational goals and to control one’s interpersonal relationships (Ferris et al., 2007; Perrewé et al., 2004). Individuals usually use their political skills to influence others’ impressions of them (Ferris et al., 2007). Thus, we adopted political skill as a potential moderator of contextual performance because, as a social skill, political skill is consistent with social exchange theory, on which this study is based.

The extant research has been focused primarily on OCB (He et al., 2020; H.-L. Liang, 2021), with fewer studies having examined the case of a forced situation. Thus, we examined the effect of CCB on subordinates’ contextual performance and further probed the causes underlying this effect.

Organizational Citizenship Behaviors and Compulsory Citizenship Behavior

Zellars et al. (2002) stated that although both OCB and CCB are citizenship behaviors that go beyond baseline job responsibilities, OCB is a voluntary behavior, whereas CCB is a behavior that employees feel is expected by the organization, and that they are forced to perform.

Psychological Safety

As well as indicating an atmosphere of trust in which employees are able to communicate freely, psychological safety for an organization’s members includes permitting and encouraging adventurous behavior (Bradley et al., 2012). As people’s behavior is triggered by their psychological climate, subordinates tend to reason and predict consequences according to their perception of psychological safety (Jones & James, 1979). Moreover, the perception of psychological safety directly affects staff members’ performance and indirectly influences their behaviors through work attitude and inspiration (Ayenew et al., 2015). In short, individuals’ behavior is based on their beliefs and expectations, whereby their perception of psychological safety significantly affects their job motivation, satisfaction, and engagement (Lyu, 2016; Tiwari & Lenka, 2016).

Contextual Performance

Although contextual performance does not directly affect an organization’s core technical processes, it encompasses activities that promote social networks (Aniefiok et al., 2018; Özçelik & Uyargil, 2019). To clarify the differences between task and contextual performance: First, task performance requires knowledge and capability that enable subordinates to accomplish the task at hand, whereas contextual performance is closely associated with volunteering, helping, and cooperative personality traits. Second, task performance is underpinned by in-role behaviors that are delineated in a job description, whereas contextual performance relies on out-of-role behaviors that are conducive to interpersonal harmony, yet cannot be so easily specified in a job description. Last, task performance involves specific activities that differ between various job levels, which means requirements and performance indicators differ according to job position or job content. By contrast, contextual performance generally involves similar behaviors at all organizational levels. For these reasons, it is more challenging to evaluate contextual versus task performance (Vigoda-Gadot, 2007). Given that variables such as job stress, emotional exhaustion, perceived organizational support, job satisfaction, and out-of-role performance have been examined in CCB-related research (Vigoda-Gadot, 2007), and each was found to correspond to contextual performance, we adopted motivation contextual performance as the outcome variable of CCB.

The Relationships of Compulsory Citizenship Behavior, Psychological Safety, and Contextual Performance

Many scholars have questioned the exclusive discretionary nature of OCB when examining its potential negative consequences (De Clercq et al., 2019; L. Zhang et al., 2018). When individuals engage in OCB, they gain social identity and respect through engaging in self-initiated behavior, whereas not performing CCB means individuals might encounter negative consequences, such as retaliation from colleagues (Vigoda-Gadot, 2007). According to Bradley et al. (2012), subordinates’ behavior is affected by personal cognition and surroundings, and their mental state is influenced by the degree of support and encouragement from leaders. This could be interpreted as indicating that subordinates’ confidence and engagement can be improved by providing a safe work environment and clear job description. Banks et al. (2014) indicated that subordinates who perceive (vs. do not perceive) psychological safety in the workplace are more likely to fully contribute and engage by creating a good communication channel with their leaders. Conversely, when subordinates perceive that that their work content is different from what they initially identified and then feel forced to engage in a compulsory citizenship behavior, this might decrease their perception of psychological safety. Moreover, Y. Liu and Keller (2021) indicated that the perception of psychological safety is a notable factor in boosting contextual performance, because subordinates who have a strong perception of psychological safety are willing to take risks to contribute to the success of the organization. Hence, we proposed the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis 1: Subordinates’ perception of psychological safety will mediate the relationship between compulsory citizenship behavior and contextual performance.

Political Skill

As outlined above, according to social exchange theory (Homans, 1958), subordinates might perform CCB to safeguard their interests if treated unkindly by a supervisor. This can weaken the exchange relationship between the two parties and, thus, reduce the subordinates’ perception of psychological safety along with their contextual performance. Taken together, we predicted that damage to psychological safety would mediate the relationship between CCB and contextual performance proposed in Hypothesis 1.
 
On the other hand, as political skill is the ability to work with and influence others to achieve organizational goals and the ability to control interpersonal relationships (Ferris et al., 2007; Perrewé et al., 2004), individuals have utilized this skill to influence others’ impression of them. Indeed, individuals with strong (vs. weak) political skills can more easily control their personal image to gain a high appraisal from others by facilitating interpersonal relationships (Brouer et al., 2015). In short, subordinates can promote their reputation and enhance others’ opinions of them by adopting political skill, thereby making the overall development of their job move in a direction that is beneficial to them. Accordingly, we formed the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis 2: Subordinates’ political skill will moderate the indirect effect of compulsory citizenship behavior on contextual performance through damage to the perception of psychological safety, such that the effect of compulsory citizenship behavior on contextual performance will be weaker for subordinates with stronger (vs. weaker) political skill.

Method

Participants and Procedure

Participants were employees of 80 businesses in a number of industries (e.g., service, technology, manufacturing) in Taiwan. Dyadic sampling was utilized to avoid common method variance (Podsakoff et al., 2003), with one version of the survey completed by supervisors and another version by their subordinates. Initially, we recruited 200 subordinate–supervisor dyads, comprising 200 supervisors paired with 600 subordinates, with between two and four subordinates matched with each supervisor. After removing data from 61 invalid dyads, data from 139 dyads (139 supervisors and 534 subordinates) were used to test the moderated mediation model, for a response rate of nearly 70%.

Regarding supervisors, 61.8% were men (n = 86) and 38.2% were women (n = 53). Most were aged between 31 and 50 years (67.9%), followed by those aged over 51 years (26.4%) and those aged between 21 and 30 years (5.7%). For marital status, 81.6% were married and 18.4% were unmarried. As regards education level, most supervisors held a bachelor’s degree (39.6%), followed by a master’s degree (29.5%), an associate’s degree (16.5%), and less than an undergraduate degree (14.4%). For the position held, most were supervisors (457.8%), followed by mid-level executives (31.3%), high-level executives (18.7%), and low-level executives (2.2%). In terms of job type, most supervisors worked in management/human resources (25.5%) and R&D/manufacturing/engineering/quality control positions (23.4%), followed by others (19.8%), administration/general affairs (13.1%), sales/marketing (10.9%), financial/accounting (5.1%), and assistant positions (2.2%). For seniority, 69.1% of supervisors had more than 9 years of experience, followed by 7–9 years of experience (12.2%), 5–7 years of experience (6.5%), 3–5 years of experience (6.5%), 1–3 years of experience (4.3%), and under 1 year of experience (1.4%). As regards industry type, most supervisors were in a service industry (32.6%), followed by manufacturing (22.5%), technology (13.8%), others (11.6%), finance (10.1%), and nonprofit (9.4%) industries.

Regarding subordinates, 41.1% were men (n = 220) and 58.9% were women (n = 314). Most were aged between 31 and 50 years (70.1%), followed by those aged between 21 and 30 years (24.4%), those aged under 20 years (4.4%), and those aged over 51 years (1.1%). In terms of marital status, 56.8% were married and 43.2% were unmarried. For education level, more than half held a bachelor’s degree (53.8%), followed by an associate’s degree (19.2%), less than an undergraduate degree (16.2%), and a master’s degree (10.8%). For the position held, most were entry-level employees (84.4%), followed by low-level employees (11.8%), middle-level employees (3.2%), and high-level employees (0.6%). As regards job type, most subordinates held development/manufacturing/engineering/quality control jobs (24.1%), followed by others (21.1%), administration/general affairs and research (20.9%), marketing/sales (11.4%), management/human resources (10.8%), financial/accounting (8.1%), assistant (2.1%), and design (1.5%) jobs. For seniority, 33.2% of subordinates had more than 9 years of experience, followed by 1–3 years of experience (22.9%), 3–5 years of experience (18.2%), under 1 year of experience (10.7%), 5–7 years of experience (10.5%), and 7–9 years of experience (4.5%). In terms of industry, most subordinates worked in a service industry (30.2%), followed by manufacturing (25.5%), technology (13.1%), others (12.8%), finance (10.5%), and nonprofit (7.9%) industries.

We sent the survey to the supervisors at each company, along with clear instructions for administration. This study originated from a project conducted by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, which received approval from the Ethics Committee of National Changhua University of Education. Purposive sampling was employed to recruit participants from nearly 500 industrial firms. Participants were informed that their responses would be kept anonymous, coded, and used only for academic research purposes. Stamped, self-addressed envelopes were provided for return of the survey form.

Measures

For all measures, items were rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale (never = 1, seldom = 2, occasionally = 3, often = 4, always = 5).

Compulsory Citizenship Behavior

To measure CCB we adopted five items from Vigoda-Gadot’s (2007) CCB measure, which had a Cronbach’s alpha of .89 in this study. A sample item is “I feel that I am forced to assist my supervisor against my will and in a way that goes beyond my formal job obligations.”
 

Contextual Performance

To measure contextual performance we adopted the 16-item measure proposed by Motowidlo and Van Scotter (1994), which had a Cronbach’s alpha of .95 in this study. A sample item is “I comply with instructions even when supervisors are not present.”
 

Psychological Safety

To measure psychological safety we adopted the seven-item Psychological Safety Scale developed by Schein and Bennis (1965), which had a Cronbach’s alpha of .68 in this study. A sample item is “As an employee in our company, I am able to bring up problems and tough issues.”
 

Political Skill

To measure political skill we used the six-item scale developed by Ferris et al. (1999), which had a Cronbach’s alpha of .83 in this study. A sample item is “I understand people well.”
 

Negative Affect (Control Variable)

We used the 10-item negative affect subscale from the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule developed by Watson et al. (1988), which had a Cronbach’s alpha of .93 in this study. The main reason we focused on negative affect is that subordinates with strongly negative emotions are prone to experiencing emotional disorders when asked to express positive emotions during work (Morris & Feldman, 1996). Respondents were given the following instructions: “The items are asking about the psychological state you have felt at work in the last 2 weeks. Please assess the degree to which you felt these emotions. Circle the most suitable options; all items are multiple choice.” A sample emotion is “Afraid.”

Results

Confirmatory Factor Analysis

We performed confirmatory factor analyses to test the construct independence of the variables in the study and also to examine the construct reliability and validity of these constructs. The measurement model showed an acceptable level of fit to the data, chi square/degrees of freedom = 3.66, root mean square error of approximation = .082, comparative fit index = .96, nonnormed fit index = .91, standardized root mean square residual = .077. Further, factor loadings ranged from .66 to .90.

Preliminary Analyses

Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients were used to examine correlations between variables. As shown in Table 1, CCB was significantly and negatively correlated with both contextual performance and perceived psychological safety, whereas perceived psychological safety was significantly and positively correlated with contextual performance.

Table 1. Means, Standard Deviations, and Correlations for Study Variables

Table/Figure

Note. ** p < .01.

Hypothesis Testing

Association of Compulsory Citizenship Behavior With Contextual Performance via Psychological Safety

After applying a hierarchical regression analysis, we found (see Table 2) that CCB was significantly and negatively associated with both contextual performance and perceived psychological safety, whereas psychological safety was significantly and positively related to contextual performance. Thus, psychological safety mediated the association between CCB and contextual performance. The standardized estimate for the indirect effect was −.04, 95% confidence interval [−0.05, −0.01]. As shown in Table 2, CCB (independent variable) decreased but retained a significant effect, and perceived psychological safety was significantly and positively related to contextual performance. We further used the Sobel test to examine the mediating effects. The results revealed a z value of 3.35 (p < .05), which is above the minimum accepted standard of 1.96. This indicates there was a significant mediating effect of perceived psychological safety in the relationship between CCB and contextual performance. Therefore, Hypothesis 1 was supported.

Table 2. Regression Analysis for Mediation Effects

Table/Figure
Note. N = 534.
** p < .01. *** p < .001.

Moderated Mediation Effect of Political Skill in the Relationship Between Compulsory Citizenship Behavior and Contextual Performance via Psychological Safety

To examine Hypothesis 2, given that the total effects model (Edwards & Lambert, 2007) and conditional process analysis (Hayes, 2022) were referred to in this study, we adopted SPSS 23.0 and PROCESS Model 14 as statistical tools. In addition, we performed a bootstrapping analysis with 5,000 resamples to calculate 95% confidence intervals (CIs; Preacher et al., 2007).
 
As shown in Table 3, the interaction between psychological safety and political skill was not significant, which means political skill did not have a significant moderating effect on the relationship between perceived psychological safety and contextual performance. The 95% CI of the indirect effect was [−0.06, 0.00] when political skill was low (−1 SD), [−0.05, 0.00] and when political skill was high (+1 SD). Both confidence interval ranges include zero; thus, political skill did not have a significant moderating effect on the relationship between CCB and contextual performance via perceived psychological safety. Therefore, Hypothesis 2 was not supported.

Table 3. Moderated Mediation Effect of Political Skill on the Relationship Between Compulsory Citizenship Behavior and Contextual Performance Through Perceived Psychological Safety

Table/Figure

Note. Bootstrapped resamples = 5,000; CI = confidence interval; LL = lower limit; UL = upper limit.

Discussion

Theoretical Contributions

We found that CCB was negatively associated with employees’ contextual performance, which supports social exchange theory. This finding aligns with those of previous studies (Ahmadian et al., 2017; Peng & Zhao, 2012). Subordinates doubt their ability to accomplish duties when they do not feel respected in the workplace (Tepper, 2007). Furthermore, CCB and life dissatisfaction have been found to increase psychological pressure and the incidence of poor mental health (Zhao et al., 2013). These sources appear to support our finding that CCB had a negative effect on subordinates’ perception of their psychological safety.

We found a positive association between perceived psychological safety and subordinates’ contextual performance. This result indicates that negative internal emotions and a negative mental state govern subordinates’ reactions in the workplace, which directly and negatively affect their performance. By contrast, subordinates who perceive high psychological safety have a tendency to show trust, engage in adventurous behaviors, and be willing to assist and cooperate with others and contribute to the organization, all of which might promote their contextual performance.

We also found that perceived psychological safety mediated the association between CCB and subordinates’ contextual performance. This is consistent with previous research on frustration–aggression, in which it is claimed that organizational frustration increases employees’ workplace withdrawal attitudes and behaviors (Keenan & Newton, 1984; Spector, 1978). Moreover, this result indicates that subordinates have a tendency to compensate for an unfair workload in high exchange relationships when they engage in CCB, even when their perception of psychological safety decreases. Therefore, our findings have academic implications for the effect of the psychological safety path between CCB and subordinates’ behaviors.

Contrary to Hypothesis 2, we did not find a moderated mediation effect of political skill on the association between compulsory citizenship behavior and contextual performance through perceived psychological safety. A possible explanation for this result might be found in Harzing (2006), who demonstrated in a 26-country study that Chinese respondents had a lower preference for extreme positive and negative responses when filling out surveys. Harzing suggested that the differences might derive from the power distance in Chinese culture. As all the respondents in our study were Chinese, and, therefore, living in a high power-distance culture (Wang & Fränti, 2022), they might have tended to choose a more neutral answer when filling out our survey.

Practical Implications and Recommendations

Our results show that managers of organizations should be conscious of the harm caused by CCB. They can design suitable procedures during the hiring process to identify supervisors who are more prone to avoiding CCB. Subordinates are not always aware that they are performing CCB since supervisors might create an atmosphere where taking on more additional work is seen as the norm in the workplace (Vigoda-Gadot, 2007), and so might not adjust their behavior. Therefore, supervisors should attempt to identify their subordinates’ mental status and account for this. Moreover, organizations could create a friendly workplace via educational training, thereby encouraging supervisors to communicate with subordinates using positive language. In addition, managers and supervisors should avoid treating subordinates in careless, abusive, or sarcastic ways, given that adopting a good leadership style can noticeably reduce CCB (H. Zhang et al., 2020).

To solve the problem of CCB from the root, it is vital to choose suitable supervisors, rather than considering how to deal with the subordinates’ decline in perception of psychological safety. Thus, supervisors must be capable of assessing whether the tasks they assign will exert too much psychological pressure on subordinates. Furthermore, supervisors could offer counseling services for subordinates to deeply understand the source of their pressure and thus avoid the destruction of their psychological safety. In short, true CCB prevention occurs when subordinates perceive that their feelings and ideas are valued in the workplace.

Increasingly, enterprises are emphasizing task performance. However, this could mean that subordinates are wholly invested in achieving their own goals and less willing to assist others. Moreover, the lack of cooperation and coordination among subordinates might result in vicious competition and an unpleasant working environment. Such an organizational culture will inevitably reduce the perception of psychological safety among subordinates. Managers should aim to shape the organizational culture by giving weight to contextual performance.

Thus, it is essential for organizations to create a better work culture through a more humanized performance management system. Specifically, supervisors should consider the relationship between their method of measuring performance and the assigned tasks. As Grote (1996) pointed out, there are three main performance measures: behaviors, results, and traits. Supervisors should decide in advance if performance measurement methods are appropriate for the assigned tasks. This could contribute to a workplace characterized by a greater willingness of subordinates to cooperate, assist, and share information and skills, thus encouraging their career development.

Limitations and Future Research Directions

In terms of methodological limitations, the results of this study were obtained from a cross-sectional analysis, and so only the correlations between variables could be measured, whereas causal relationships could not be determined. Future researchers could perform a longitudinal analysis to infer cause-and-effect relationships. In addition, to measure perception of psychological safety, we adopted the seven-item Psychological Safety Scale, which had a Cronbach’s alpha of .68. DeVellis and Thorpe (2021) indicated that although a range from .60 to .70 is acceptable, the reliability should preferably be higher than .70. Hence, in future work a more reliable scale could be adopted. Concerning theoretical limitations, the moderated mediation model of this research was constructed using CCB, contextual performance, perceived psychological safety, and political skill as variables. However, all participants were Chinese, which means that the generalizability of the model may be insufficient in the context of different cultures. Future research could expand the sampling range to strengthen the external validity of the results.

Ahmadian, S., Sesen, H., & Soran, S. (2017). Expanding the boundaries of compulsory citizenship behavior: Its impact on some organizational outputs. Business and Economic Horizons, 13(1), 110–118.
 
Aniefiok, A. G., Vongsinsirkul, S., Suwandee, S., & Jabutay, F. (2018, May 17–18). The impact of workplace conflict on employees’ contextual performance and commitment: A case study of private universities in Thailand [Paper presentation]. 2018 5th International Conference on Business and Industrial Research, Bangkok, Thailand.
 
Ayenew, A. A., Gracia, F. J., & Toderi, S. (2015). Linking trust to safety performance in nuclear power plants: The mediating role of team learning. CLEAR International Journal of Research in Management, Sciences and Technology, 5(10), 1–14.
 
Baer, M., & Frese, M. (2003). Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(1), 45–68.
 
Banks, G. C., Batchelor, J. H., Seers, A., O’Boyle, E. H., Jr., Pollack, J. M., & Gower, K. (2014). What does team–member exchange bring to the party? A meta-analytic review of team and leader social exchange. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(2), 273–295.
 
Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Harvard University Press.
 
Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10(2), 99–109.
 
Bradley, B. H., Postlethwaite, B. E., Klotz, A. C., Hamdani, M. R., & Brown, K. G. (2012). Reaping the benefits of task conflict in teams: The critical role of team psychological safety climate. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 151–158.
 
Brouer, R. L., Badaway, R. L., Coleman Gallagher, V., & Haber, J. A. (2015). Political skill dimensionality and impression management choice and effective use. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(2), 217–233.
 
De Clercq, D., Suhail, A., Umer Azeem, M., & Ul Haq, I. (2019). Citizenship pressure and job performance: Roles of citizenship fatigue and continuance commitment. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 59(3), 482–505.
 
Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869–884.
 
DeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2021). Scale development: Theory and applications (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
 
Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 1–22.
 
Ferris, G. R., Berkson, H. M., Kaplan, D. M., Gilmore, D. C., Buckley, M. R., Hochwarter, W. A., & Witt, L. A. (1999, August 5–7). Development and initial validation of the Political Skill Inventory [Paper presentation]. 59th Annual National Meeting of the Academy of Management, Chicago, IL, USA.
 
Ferris, G. R., Treadway, D. C., Perrewé, P. L., Brouer, R. L., Douglas, C., & Lux, S. (2007). Political skill in organizations. Journal of Management, 33(3), 290–320.
 
Ge, Y. (2020). Psychological safety, employee voice, and work engagement. Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, 48(3), Article e8907.
 
Grote, D. (1996). The complete guide to performance appraisal. Amacom Books.
 
Harzing, A.-W. (2006). Response styles in cross-national survey research: A 26-country study. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 6(2), 243–266.
 
Hawkes, C. L., & Weathington, B. L. (2014). Competency-based versus task-based job descriptions: Effects on applicant attraction. Institute of Behavioral and Applied Management, 15(3), 190–211.
 
Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.
 
He, P., Zhou, Q., Zhao, H., Jiang, C., & Wu, Y. J. (2020). Compulsory citizenship behavior and employee creativity: Creative self-efficacy as a mediator and negative affect as a moderator. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 1640.
 
Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597–606.
 
Jones, A. P., & James, L. R. (1979). Psychological climate: Dimensions and relationships of individual and aggregated work environment perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23(2), 201–250.
 
Keenan, A., & Newton, T. J. (1984). Frustration in organization: Relationships to role stress, climate and psychological strain. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 57(1), 57–65.
 
Köksal, K., & Gürsoy, A. (2020). Compulsory citizenship behavior and organizational commitment: The role of leader-member exchange. In E. Baykal (Ed.), Handbook of research on positive organizational behavior for improved workplace performance (pp. 162–178). Business Science Reference/IGI Global.
 
Liang, H.-L. (2021). Compulsory citizenship behavior and facades of conformity: A moderated mediation model of neuroticism and citizenship pressure. Psychological Reports. Advance online publication.
 
Liang, J., Farh, C. I. C., & Farh, J.-L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice behavior: A two-wave longitudinal examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71–92.
 
Liu, Y., & Keller, R. T. (2021). How psychological safety impacts R&D project teams’ performance. Research-Technology Management, 64(2), 39–45.
 
Liu, Z., Min, Q., Zhai, Q., & Smyth, R. L. (2016). Self-disclosure in Chinese micro-blogging: A social exchange theory perspective. Information & Management, 53(1), 53–63.
 
Lyu, X. (2016). Effect of organizational justice on work engagement with psychological safety as a mediator: Evidence from China. Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, 44(8), 1359–1370.
 
Morris, J. A., & Feldman, D. C. (1996). The dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of emotional labor. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 986–1010.
 
Motowidlo, S. J., & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 475–480.
 
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books/D. C. Heath & Co.
 
Özçelik, G., & Uyargil, C. B. (2019). Performance management systems: Task-contextual dilemma owing to the involvement of the psychological contract and organizational citizenship behavior. European Management Review, 16(2), 347–362.
 
Peng, Z. L., & Zhao, H. D. (2012). Does organization citizenship behavior really benefit the organization? Study on the compulsory citizenship behavior in China [In Chinese]. Nankai Business Review International, 3(1), 75–92.
 
Perrewé, P. L., Zellars, K. L., Ferris, G. R., Rossi, A. M., Kacmar, C. J., & Ralston, D. A. (2004). Neutralizing job stressors: Political skill as an antidote to the dysfunctional consequences of role conflict stressors. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 141–152.
 
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie S. C., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
 
Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227.
 
Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714.
 
Rich, B. L., LePine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617–635.
 
Schein, E. H., & Bennis, W. G. (1965). Personal and organizational change through group methods: The laboratory approach. Wiley.
 
Schein, E. H., Schneier, I., & Barker, C. H. (1961). Coercive persuasion. W. W. Norton & Company.
 
Smithson, J., & Lewis, S. (2000). Is job insecurity changing the psychological contract? Personnel Review, 29(6), 680–702.
 
Spector, P. E. (1978). Organizational frustration: A model and review of the literature. Personnel Psychology, 31(4), 815–829.
 
Tepper, B. J. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33(3), 261–289.
 
Tiwari, B., & Lenka, U. (2016). Building psychological safety for employee engagement in post-recession. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 30(1), 19–22.
 
Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2007). Redrawing the boundaries of OCB? An empirical examination of compulsory extra-role behavior in the workplace. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21(3), 377–405.
 
Wang, S., & Fränti, P. (2022). How power distance affect motivation in cross-cultural environment: Findings from Chinese companies in Europe. STEM Education, 2(2), 96–120.
 
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.
 
Zellars, K. L., Tepper, B. J., & Duffy, M. K. (2002). Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6), 1068–1076.
 
Zhang, H., Liu, Z., & Wang, Y. (2020). How transformational leadership positively impacts organizational citizenship behavior in successful Chinese social work service organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 30(3), 467–485.
 
Zhang, L., Yang, S., Zhang, L., & Li, B. (2018). Impact of compulsory citizenship behavior on employees’ job burnout—A mediated moderation model [In Chinese]. Journal of Northeastern University, 39(9), 1358–1363.
 
Zhao, H., Peng, Z., Han, Y., Sheard, G., & Hudson, A. (2013). Psychological mechanism linking abusive supervision and compulsory citizenship behavior: A moderated mediation study. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 147(2), 177–195.

Table 1. Means, Standard Deviations, and Correlations for Study Variables

Table/Figure

Note. ** p < .01.


Table 2. Regression Analysis for Mediation Effects

Table/Figure
Note. N = 534.
** p < .01. *** p < .001.

Table 3. Moderated Mediation Effect of Political Skill on the Relationship Between Compulsory Citizenship Behavior and Contextual Performance Through Perceived Psychological Safety

Table/Figure

Note. Bootstrapped resamples = 5,000; CI = confidence interval; LL = lower limit; UL = upper limit.


This study was partially supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan.

Shu-Chuan Lee, Human Resources Department, National Changhua University of Education, 500, 2 Shida Road, Changhua, Taiwan 500. Email: [email protected]

Article Details

© 2022 Scientific Journal Publishers Limited. All Rights Reserved.